CACTMAD - Centro Académico Clínico de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, Av. da Noruega, Lordelo 5000-508 Vila Real, Portugal.
*Corresponding Author : Carolina Marques
CACTMAD - Centro Académico Clínico de Trás-os-
Montes e Alto Douro, Av. da Noruega, Lordelo 5000508 Vila Real, Portugal.
Email: [email protected]
Received : Jan 06, 2025
Accepted : Jan 29, 2025
Published : Feb 05, 2025
Archived : www.jcimcr.org
Copyright : © Marques C (2025).
Rectal Vascular Malformations (RVM) are rare and poorly documented, primarily relying on case reports and a small number of case studies found in the literature [1-4]. Typically, this condition leads to painless rectal bleeding in young adults, with more than half of the cases presenting with anemia [2,5,6]. Additional symptoms, such as constipation and abdominal pain, have also been documented [3] and 10% of the cases are incidentally diagnosed [3,5].
Since the physical examination, including digital rectal examination, can be inconclusive, there are various complementary diagnostic methods that assist in the diagnosis and management of this pathology, such as colonoscopy, contrast-enhanced Computerized Tomography (CT) scan, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) [6-8].
Colonoscopy is a valuable tool for diagnosis and determining the extent of the disease. The presence of multiple bluish-purple submucosal masses, indicative of dilated tortuous blood vessels, strongly suggests vascular malformation (VM) [3,4,9,10].
CT angiography aids in characterizing the disease, outlining its extent, and assessing involvement with adjacent structures [9]. Moreover, CT angiography can identify the vascular supply of high-flow lesions, reveal draining vessels, and indicate the presence of phleboliths, characteristic of low-flow venous malformation. However, for VM-related lesions, especially in follow-up, MRI outperforms CT. On T2-weighted images, MRI enables the detection of high-signal-intensity wall thickening with multiple serpiginous structures in the perirectal region, suggesting increased vascularity and blooming phleboliths. MRI is also superior to CT in locating the upper limit of the lesion and assessing its extension into adjacent organs [9].
A biopsy of these lesions is not recommended due to the risk of severe bleeding [11].
We present the case of a 49-year-old man referred to a general surgery consultation due to chronic anal pain since childhood and episodes of rectal bleeding persisting for 17 years. Additionally, he was being monitored in hematology due to an iron-deficiency anemia and was receiving optimized medical treatment. There were no alterations to the physical examination.
He performed a colonoscopy (Figure 1), CT scan (Figure 2), and MRI (Figure 3).
The treatments described for this pathology are abdominoperineal resection or anterior rectum resection with total mesorectal excision. Vascular embolization, radiotherapy and sclerotherapy have been suggested as management options, but they have had varying degrees of success. These conservative therapies are limited to poor candidates for surgical resection due to RVM´s transmural involvement and risk of recurrence [10].
The case was discussed in a multidisciplinary team, including vascular and general surgeons and the advantages and risks of the surgery were explained to the patient. Since the symptoms have been controlled lately, the patient refused the surgery, keeping follow-up in the consultation.