Journal of Clinical Images and Medical Case Reports

ISSN 2766-7820
Review Article - Open Access, Volume 3

Clinical characteristics, laboratory profile and imaging results in COVID-19 cases

Mohammad Nematshahi1; Mahboubeh Neamatshahi2; Fahimeh Attarian3*; Davood Soroosh4*; Faeze Rahimi5

1 Department of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, Sabzevar University of Medical Science, Sabzevar, Iran.

2 Community Medicine Department, Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences, Sabzevar, Iran.

3 Department of Public Health, School of Health, Torbat Heydariyeh University of Medical Sciences, Torbat Heydariyeh, Iran.

4 Clinical Research Development Unit, Hospital Research Development Committee, Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences, Sabzevar, Iran.

5 Clinical Research Development Unit, Hospital Research Development Committee, Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences, Sabzevar, Iran.

*Corresponding Author: Fahimeh Attarian
Department of Public Health, School of Health, Torbat Heydariyeh University of Medical Sciences, Torbat Heydariyeh, Iran.
Email: [email protected]

Received : Nov 11, 2021

Accepted : Jan 18, 2022

Published : Jan 25, 2022

Archived : www.jcimcr.org

Copyright : © Attarian F & Soroosh D (2022).

Abstract

Background: COVID-19 has been identified as one of the most urgent issues in health care systems worldwide. Identification of the prognostic-related characteristics in the patients with COVID-19 for timely diagnosis and treatment is the most important current priority of treatment systems. This study aimed to determine the clinical characteristics, laboratory and imaging profile of COVID-19 cases.

Methods: This cross-sectional study carried out on 508 suspected or confirmed patients with COVID-19 who were hospitalized and treated between February 2020 and May 2020. The data were included age, gender, clinical and laboratory findings, and outcome in the patients. After describing the data, any possible relationship between the patients’ characteristics and outcome was assessed in the sample.

Results: The mean age of the patients was 59.3 ± 18.2 years and 55.9% were male. Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) test was positive in only 33.3% of the hospitalized patients. Shortness of breath, fever and dry cough were the most common symptoms and 16.3% of the patients required Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Finally, 81.9% of the patients improved and 18.1% were died. Changes in the heart rhythm, blood pressure and O2 saturation level, WBC and percentage of abnormal lymphocytes, creatinine and potassium levels were the most important factors associated with mortality in the patients (P <0.05).

Conclusion: COVID-19 is a new infectious disease in which fever and cough are the most common clinical symptoms, even if they do not have a confirmed diagnosis. In this study, in addition to old age, some clinical symptoms and hematological markers were observed in the patients that may be helpful in the prognosis of the patients with COVID-19.

Keywords: COVID-19; hematological marker; clinical symptoms.

Citation: Nematshahi M, Neamatshahi M, Attarian F, Soroosh D, Rahimi F. Clinical characteristics, laboratory profile and imaging results in COVID-19 cases. J Clin Images Med Case Rep. 2022; 3(1): 1612.

Introduction

COVID-19 was first reported in Wuhan, China in December 2019, and is one of the most important current health problems worldwide [1]. The World Health Organization (WHO) introduced it as the current health emergency [2]. In Iran, the first case of COVID-19 was reported in late February 2020 in Qom and then spread rapidly throughout Iran [3]. Since humans are now recognized as the most important source of infection and the most common method of transmitting the disease through contact with the respiratory droplets of an infected person [1,4], the most important way to control the spread of the disease is breaking the transmission chain with rapid detection [5,6]. On the other hand, in order to reduce the complications and fatality of the disease, recognizing the clinical and laboratory characteristics of hospitalized patients and timely diagnosis and treatment and identifying factors related to patients’ prognosis is the current priority of treatment systems that will reduce complications and mortality [7-9]. Currently, Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) or detection of the virus genome in the serum of an infected person is the gold standard for diagnosis [6,9]. PCR is time consuming and difficult [9] and may be erroneous but is the only criterion for definitive diagnosis [7,8]. However, there is ample evidence that diagnosis through lung imaging is faster, cheaper, and more valuable than PCR [7,10]. Although there is still no complete evidence for factors associated with increased mortality in the patients but the patient’s age, gender and associated underlying disease such as hypertension and diabetes and a previous history of pneumonia or malignancy, fever, cough, respiratory involvement, decreased white blood cells and increased neutrophils are the most important possible factors associated with poor prognosis in the hospitalized patients due to COVID-19 [6,11-14].

However, as different evidences of the prevalence and severity of the COVID-19 have been reported in different races or geographical areas, the need for further epidemic studies in different parts of the world is felt [1,2,12]. A study by Khalili et al, which was performed on 1061 patients admitted to Masih Daneshvari hospital in Tehran, showed that gender, age, white blood cell count and neutrophil and lymphocyte percentage in patients with COVID-19 were decreased. The most important hematological markers such as creatinine, potassium, total blood proteins, troponin and albumin are the most important biochemical factors with poor prognosis in these patients [15]. In a study by Moghaddami et al, the clinical, laboratory and demographic characteristics of 113 confirmed patients with COVID-19 was assessed and the reduction of O2 saturation was the most important finding related to poor prognosis in these patients [14]. The present study was performed to determine and describe clinical, laboratory and radiological findings in the suspected and confirmed COVID-19 in Sabzevar.

Methods

This cross-sectional study carried out on 508 suspected or confirmed patients with COVID-19 who were hospitalized and treated between February 2020 and May 2020 in Sabzevar hospital as a medical center dedicated to the treatment of COVID-19. It is noteworthy that since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic in Iran, one medical center in each city has been dedicated to treat this disease. In this study, the method of sampling was census and all suspected COVID-19 referred to the hospital at a certain time were included in the study.

All hospitalized patients, after initial tests and basic examinations were evaluated for infection with COVID-19 using PCR test and imaging. According to the definition of the World Health Organization, the confirmed case of COVID-19 was considered as a patient with a positive test of the Real-Time Reverse-Transcription-Polymerase-Chain-Reaction (RT-PCR) in the respiratory secretions for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 virus. A suspected case was also considered as a patient with a negative test or without a test but with clinical symptoms of pneumonia, fever, cough or respiratory involvement [16]. The variables evaluated in this study include age, gender, underlying disease or other clinical variables such as systolic and diastolic blood pressure (mmHg), respiration rate (rate / minute) and heart rate (beats / minute), fever, dry cough, shortness of breath, sore throat and blood panel including Complete Blood cell Count (CBC), C-Reactive Protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate [2], blood PH, chest imaging and PCR results. After describing the variables, any possible association between clinical and laboratory findings and outcome in these patients was assessed.

Statistical issues

After collecting the data, quantitative variables were described as mean and standard deviation, and qualitative variables were also described as frequency and percentage. Then, any statistical relationship between variables and disease outcome was examined by Chi-square test, Fisher’s exact test or independent t-test. A P value less than of 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

In this study, 508 suspected and confirmed patients with COVID-19 with a mean age of 59.3 ± 18.22 years (ranging from 12 to 94 years) were admitted to Sabzevar hospital during the first peak of COVID-19 in Iran. There were 284 men (55.9%) and 224 women (44.1%). PCR test was positive in only 169 patients (33.3% of patients), while chest imaging results were abnormal in 408 patients (80.3% of patients). Also, 16.3% of patients (83 patients) equired to be admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and finally 416 patients (81.9%) recovered and were discharged. Death was occurred in 92 patients of suspected or confirmed patients (Table 1).

Table 1:General status of suspected or confirmed patients COVID-19.

Frequency (%)

Variable

284( 55.9)

Male

Gender

224 (44.1)

Female

169(33.3)

Positive

PCR

283 (55.7)

Negative

56 (11)

Not reported

100 (19.7)

Normal

Chest imaging

408 (80.30)

Abnormal

425(83.70)

No

Need to ICU

83(16.30)

Yes

416(81.90)

Recovery

Outcome

92(18.10)

Death

The length of stay at hospital varied from 1 to 44 days with a mean of 5.53 days. The mean oxygen saturation was 88.1 ± 9.7% and the patients’ heart rate and respiratory rate were 93.67 and 20.49 times per minute, respectively, and the mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures were 110.8 and 7.3 mmHg, respectively. Fever (57.9%), dry cough (57.3%) and shortness of breath (77.7%) were the most common clinical symptoms. Ground glass opacity (82.8%), consolidation (25%) and bilateral lung involvement (70.2%) was the most important radiological findings in the suspected or confirmed patients with COVID-19 (Table 2).

Table 2:Frequency of clinical symptoms and chest imaging results in the suspected or confirmed patients with COVID-19.

Variable

Frequency (%)

Variable

Frequency (%)

Abdominal pain

No

494 (97.2)

Comorbidity

No

245(48.2)

Yes

14 (2.8)

Yes

263 (51.8)

Nausea

No

472 (92.9)

Fever

No

214 (42.1)

Yes

36 (7.1)

Yes

294 (57.9)

Vomiting

No

463 (91.1)

Shortness of breath

No

116 (22.8)

Yes

45 (8.9)

Yes

392 (77.7)

Consolidation

No

306(75.2)

Dry cough

No

217 (42.7)

Yes

102(25.0)

Yes

291 (57.3)

Ground glass opacity

No

70(12.7)

Sore throat

No

479 (94.3)

Yes

338(82.8)

Yes

29 (5.7)

Bilateral lung involvement

No

115(28.3)

Headache

No

501 (98.6)

Yes

285(70.2)

Yes

7 (1.4)

Hematological evaluation of the patients showed that the mean number of white blood cells in the sample was 7,932 cm and the mean hemoglobin was 12.7 g/dl. The percentage of lymphocytes and neutrophils were 20% and 76%, respectively and the mean erythrocyte sedimentation rate was 34.95 mm/h. Other biochemical profile and blood panel evaluation are summarized in Table 3.

Table 3: Evaluation of cellular and biochemical profiles of in suspected or confirmed patients with COVID-19.

Mean ± SD

Variable

79329±7276

WBC (cmm)

CBC

20±12

Lymphocytes (%)

76±13

Neutrophils (%)

12.69±2.27

Hemoglobin (g/dl)

1.4±1.7

Cr (mg/dl)

Biochemical profile

137.5±9.65

Na (meq/l)

4.14±0.6

K(mmol/l)

7.3±0.36

PH

34.95±30.3

ESR (mm/h)

Age, fever, dry cough, lethargy, irregular heart rhythm, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, White Blood Cell (WBC) and hemoglobin levels, lymphocyte and neutrophil count, creatinine level, blood potassium, O2 saturation and hospitalization in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) were the most important clinical and laboratory findings related to outcome in these patients.

Consolidation was also the most important outcome-related radiological finding in these patients. Any association between clinical, laboratory, and radiological characteristics and outcome in these patients is summarized in Tables 4 and 5.

Table 4:Comparison of clinical symptoms in the patients who recover or died following COVID-19.

P value

Outcome

Variable

Recovery

Death

0.19*

227(54.6)

57(62.0)

Male

Gender

189(45.4)

35(38.0)

Female

0.001*

161(38.7)

53(57.6)

No

Fever

255(61.3)

39(42.4)

Yes

<0.001*

154(37.0)

63(68.5)

No

Dry cough

262(63.0)

29(31.5)

Yes

0.53*

391(94.0)

88(95.7)

No

Sore throat

25(6.0)

4(4.3)

Yes

0.36**

409(98.3)

92(100)

No

Headache

7(1.7)

0

Yes

0.99**

404(97.1)

90(97.8)

No

Abdominal pain

12(2.9)

2(2.2)

Yes

0.11*

390(938)

82(89.1)

No

Nausea

26(6.2)

10(10.9)

Yes

0.11*

383(92.1)

80(87.0)

No

Vomiting

33(7.9)

12(13.0)

Yes

   *  0.39

226(54.3)

57 (61.9)

Negative

PCR

143 (34.1)

27 (29.3)

Positive

48 (11.5)

8(8.7)

Not reported

0.27*

99(23.8)

17(18.5)

No

Shortness of breath

317(76.2)

75(81.5)

Yes

<0.001*

382(91.8)

56(60.9)

No

Lethargy

34(8.2)

36(39.1)

Yes

0.03*

145(35.5)

43(47.8)

Tachycardia

Heart rate

255(62.3)

43(47.8)

Normal

9(2.2)

4(4.4)

Bradycardia

0.74**

397(97.0)

87(96.6)

Normal

Breath rate

12(2.9)

3(3.3)

Abnormal

0.29*

361(90.9)

75(87.2)

Normal ) >1500)

Neutrophils

36(9.1)

11(12.8)

Abnormal (<1500)

<0.001*

156(39.3)

60(69.0)

Decreased (<1100)

Lymphocytes

220(55.4)

23(26.4)

Normal (1100-3000)

21(5.3)

4(4.6)

Increased ) >3000)

<0.001*

366(88.0)

59(64.1)

No

ICU admission

50(12.0)

33(35.9)

Yes

0.14*

87(20.9)

13(14.1)

Normal

CT

329(79.1)

79(85.9)

Abnormal

<0.001*

263(79.9)

43(54.4)

No

Consolidation

66(20.1)

36(45.6)

Yes

0.14*

52(15.8)

18(22.8)

No

Ground glass opacity

277(84.2)

61(77.2)

Yes

0.09**

100(30.5)

15(19.2)

No

Bilateral lung involvement

223(68.0)

62(79.5)

Yes

5(1.5)

1(1.3)

Not reported

* Pearson Chi-Square ** Fisher's Exact Test


Table 5:Comparison of quantitative variables in the patients who recover or died following COVID-19.

P value

Mean± SD

N

Outcome

Variable

0.04

57.3±18.8

416

Recovery

Age

68.5±15.8

92

Death

<0.001

119.5±20.6

409

Recovery

Systolic blood pressure

113.3±30.2

90

Death

0.03

73.9±11.8

410

Recovery

Diastolic blood pressure

70.0±13.6

87

Death

<0.001

89.2±8.6

406

Recovery

O2 saturation

82.2±12.1

89

Death

0.003

93.1±16.3

409

Recovery

Heart rate

95.8±21.6

90

Death

0.04

76217±6688

401

Recovery

WBC

93509±9425

88

Death

<0.001

0.22±0.1

397

Recovery

Lymphocytes

0.14±0.1

87

Death

0.04

0.74±0.1

397

Recovery

Neutrophils

0.82±0.1

86

Death

<0.001

12.8±2.1

401

Recovery

Hemoglobin

12.1±2.8

88

Death

0.001

1.21±0.7

371

Recovery

Creatinine

2.20±1.7

88

Death

<0.001

4.11±0.5

361

Recovery

Potassium

4.26±0.8

87

Death

Discussion

In the present study, clinical symptoms, laboratory markers and chest imaging results were evaluated in a sample of suspected or confirmed patients with COVID-19 admitted to Sabzevar hospital. Only 33.3% of the patients admitted to the COVID-19 specific hospital had a positive PCR test and there was no significant difference between the survivors of the COVID-19 and the deceased patients and 16.30% of all patients were admitted to the ICU. Hospitalization in the ICU was associated with mortality. Mortality of the patients in the first peak of COVID-19 in Sabzevar was 18.1% and the most common clinical symptoms were fever, dry cough and lethargy and the most important hematological and biochemical markers associated with poor prognosis was an increase in the mean White Blood Cell (WBC) and decrease in the percentage of lymphocytes and the level of creatinine and potassium. Consolidation was also the most important finding of abnormal chest imaging associated with mortality

In the present study, the mean age of the patients was approximately 60 years. Older age and the underlying disease was the most common characteristic of suspected or confirmed patients with COVID-19 [12,14,17-20]. Similarly, in a study by Khalili et al, which was performed on 1,061 suspected or confirmed patients with COVID-19 in Tehran, a significant difference in the mean age of the patients was reported according to the outcome of the disease [15]. In a study by Wang et al, the mean age was higher and the prevalence of the underlying disease was reported in the patients with more severe disease or hospitalization in the ICU than other patients [17]. Shahriarirad et al in a study on the patients with confirmed COVID-19 reported the highest mortality rate in the patients over 75 years of age accompanied by underlying disease [14].

The sex ratio (male to female) in the present study was 1.27, which was similar to the results of previous studies in Iran and other parts of the world. The need for hospitalization was 1.22 [21] and in the secondary study of 6,515 suspected or confirmed patients was 1.30 [22]. In another study, sex ratio was 1.98 [19] and in different results in a sample of 1,420 confirmed European patients with mild to moderate disease, this ratio was 0.47 [12]. Although in the present study, no statistically significant relationship was found between gender and mortality (p = 0.19), but the possibility of a relationship between gender and disease severity and different prognosis in the two genders according to the findings of the present study and previous studies should be considered [23]. In the present study, the most common clinical symptoms in the patients with COVID-19 was fever (57.9%), dry cough (57.3%) and shortness of breath (77.7%), which were mainly related to the mortality of the disease. This finding was consistent with the results of previous findings [24-27]. In a secondary study by Cao et al, the most common symptoms were fever (87.3%) and cough (58.1%) [21]. A study conducted in southern Iran also identified fever (67.59%) and cough (73.64%) as the most common symptoms in confirmed hospitalized patients [14].

Previous findings show arrhythmia and tachypnea, changes in blood pressure, and oxygen saturation are the most important clinical features associated with mortality in the patients with COVID-19 [14,17,21,28,29]. In the present study, these factors also were related to mortality. The highest mean heart rate and the lowest level of oxygen saturation and blood pressure were seen in the patients with more severe disease. Increasing the mean of white blood cells and decreasing the percentage of lymphocytes and decreasing the amount of hemoglobin in the blood were also the most important hematological findings related to the mortality. These findings were consistent with lots of studies [14,15,18,21,26]. Cao et al also reported a decrease in blood lymphocytes (lymphopenia) in 57% of the patients and an increase in white blood cells in 11% of cases [21]. In a study by Pourabdollah et al., the highest mean number of white blood cells and blood creatinine level and the lowest level of lymphocytes were reported in deceased patients [15]. However, in studies with low sample size, this relationship was not significant [14].

Another important finding of the present study was the results of abnormal imaging results in the patients studied, so that evidence of consolidation was seen on imaging of a quarter of patients. Ground glass opacity and bilateral lung involvement were the most common abnormal findings of lung CT in the patients. On the other hand, there was a significant relationship between abnormal imaging results and mortality of the patients, so that consolidation and bilateral lung involvement were related to mortality. This finding was consistent with the findings of previous studies; however a lot of evidence reports the diagnostic value of imaging findings in COVID-19 patients [7,9,10,21,30,31]. In a study by Ng et al and Besharat et al. ground glass opacity and consolidation lesions were reported as the most common abnormal findings in CT [7,32]. In the secondary study by Cao et al. the results of 31 studies showed that ground glass opacity and bilateral lung involvement were as the most common radiological findings [21].

Overall, the fatality rate of the disease in the present study was 18.1%, and Rodriguez-Morales et al reported the mortality rate in hospitalized patients at 13.9% [27]. The need for ICU hospitalization in our study was observed in one-sixth of patients, which was lower than the estimates of previous studies [21]. The mortality rate in ICU patients was also 36%, which was much lower than previous estimates. The mortality rate in ICU patients was estimated to be 41.9% [33]. In a study performed on 1,061 patients admitted to Tehran hospital, the fatality rate in hospitalized patients was reported to be 12.2% [15]. Although in the study of Cao et al., the fatality rate of the disease in all patients in China was estimated to be 6%, [21]. The low estimate of mortality rate in this study is probably due to the study of the results of 31 articles in which the data of all patients with confirmed COVID-19 were studied regardless of hospitalization status. In another secondary study, on the data of 3,600 suspected or confirmed patients, 25.6% of the cases were severe and the fatality rate of the disease was 3.5% [26]. Despite the appropriate sample size and complete review of patients’ files, this study has some limitations. The first limitation of the present study is the admission of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and the lack of outpatient’s cases. Incomplete completion of the case has been another limitation of the present study, which can be expected according to its retrospective approach.

Conclusion

COVID-19 is a new infectious disease in which fever and cough are the most common clinical symptoms, even if they do not have a confirmed diagnosis. In this study, in addition to old age, some clinical symptoms and hematological markers were observed in the patients that may be helpful in the prognosis of the patients with COVID-19.

References

  1. Heymann DL, Shindo N. COVID-19: What is next for public health? The Lancet. 2020; 395: 542-545.
  2. Wang C, Horby PW, Hayden FG, Gao GF. A novel coronavirus outbreak of global health concern. The Lancet. 2020; 395: 470- 473.
  3. Ahmadi M, Sharifi A, Dorosti S, Ghoushchi SJ, Ghanbari N. Investigation of effective climatology parameters on COVID-19 outbreak in Iran. Science of the Total Environment. 2020: 138705.
  4. Nematshahi M, Soroosh D, Neamatshahi M, Attarian F, Rahimi F. Factors predicting readmission in patients with COVID-19. BMC Research Notes. 2021; 14: 374.
  5. Jia J, Hu X, Yang F, Song X, Dong L, Zhang J, et al. Epidemiological characteristics on the clustering nature of COVID-19 in Qingdao City, 2020: A descriptive analysis. Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness. 2020: 1-5.
  6. McIntosh K, Hirsch M, Bloom A. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): Epidemiology, virology, and prevention. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020; 1: 2019-2020.
  7. Ng MY, Lee EY, Yang J, Yang F, Li X, Wang H, et al. Imaging profile of the COVID-19 infection: radiologic findings and literature review. Radiology: Cardiothoracic Imaging. 2020; 2: e200034.
  8. Chen N, Zhou M, Dong X, Qu J, Gong F, Han Y, et al. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study. The Lancet. 2020; 395: 507-513.
  9. Bernheim A, Mei X, Huang M, Yang Y, Fayad ZA, Zhang N, et al. Chest CT findings in coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19): Relationship to duration of infection. Radiology. 2020: 200463.
  10. Chung M, Bernheim A, Mei X, Zhang N, Huang M, Zeng X, et al. CT imaging features of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV). Radiology. 2020; 295: 202-207.
  11. Lian J, Jin X, Hao S, Cai H, Zhang S, Zheng L, et al. Analysis of epidemiological and clinical features in older patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outside Wuhan. Clinical infectious diseases. 2020; 71: 740-747.
  12. Lechien JR, Chiesa‐Estomba CM, Place S, Van Laethem Y, Cabaraux P, Mat Q, et al. Clinical and epidemiological characteristics of 1,420 European patients with mild‐to‐moderate coronavirus disease 2019. Journal of internal medicine. 2020.
  13. Tan SC. Clinical and epidemiological characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. medRxiv. 2020.
  14. Shahriarirad R, Khodamoradi Z, Erfani A, Hosseinpour H, Ranjbar K, Emami Y, et al. Epidemiological and clinical features of 2019 novel coronavirus diseases (COVID-19) in the South of Iran. BMC infectious diseases. 2020; 20: 1-12.
  15. Toutkaboni MP, Askari E, Khalili N, Tabarsi P, Jamaati H, Velayati AA, et al. Demographics, laboratory parameters and outcomes of 1061 patients with coronavirus disease 2019: A report from Tehran, Iran. New Microbes and New Infections. 2020; 38: 100777.
  16. Organization WH. Clinical management of severe acute respiratory infection when novel coronavirus (nCoV) infection is suspected, Interim guidance, 13 March 2020. 2020.
  17. Wang D, Hu B, Hu C, Zhu F, Liu X, Zhang J, et al. Clinical characteristics of 138 hospitalized patients with 2019 novel coronavirus–infected pneumonia in Wuhan, China. Jama. 2020; 323: 1061-1069.
  18. Zhou F, Yu T, Du R, Fan G, Liu Y, Liu Z, et al. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. The lancet. 2020.
  19. Wang K, Qiu Z, Liu J, Fan T, Liu C, Tian P, et al. Analysis of the clinical characteristics of 77 COVID-19 deaths. Scientific reports. 2020; 10: 1-11.
  20. Daneshfar M, Dadashzadeh N, Ahmadpour M, Ragati Haghi H, Rahmani V, Forouzesh M, et al. Lessons of mortality following COVID-19 epidemic in the United States especially in the geriatrics. J Nephropharmacol. 2021; 10: e06.
  21. Cao Y, Liu X, Xiong L, Cai K. Imaging and clinical features of patients with 2019 novel coronavirus SARS‐CoV‐2: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Journal of medical virology. 2020.
  22. Farsalinos K, Barbouni A, Poulas K, Polosa R, Caponnetto P, et al. Current smoking, former smoking, and adverse outcome among hospitalized COVID-19 patients: A systematic review and metaanalysis. Therapeutic advances in chronic disease. 2020; 11: 2040622320935765.
  23. Pradhan A, Olsson PE. Sex differences in severity and mortality from COVID-19: Are males more vulnerable? Biology of sex Differences. 2020; 11: 1-11.
  24. Yang J, Zheng Y, Gou X, Pu K, Chen Z, Guo Q, et al. Prevalence of comorbidities in the novel Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International journal of infectious diseases. 2020.
  25. Hu Y, Sun J, Dai Z, Deng H, Li X, Huang Q, et al. Prevalence and severity of corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19): A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Virology. 2020: 104371.
  26. Fu L, Wang B, Yuan T, Chen X, Ao Y, Fitzpatrick T, et al. Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Infection. 2020.
  27. Rodriguez Morales AJ, Cardonam Ospina JA, Gutiérrezm Ocampo E, Villamizar Peña R, Holguin Rivera Y, et al. Clinical, laboratory and imaging features of COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Travel medicine and infectious disease. 2020: 101623.
  28. Schiffrin EL, Flack JM, Ito S, Muntner P, Webb RC. Hypertension and COVID-19. Oxford University Press US; 2020.
  29. Meng J, Xiao G, Zhang J, He X, Ou M, Bi J, et al. Renin-angiotensin system inhibitors improve the clinical outcomes of COVID-19 patients with hypertension. Emerging microbes & infections. 2020; 9: 757-760.
  30. Yang W, Yan F. Patients with RT-PCR-confirmed COVID-19 and normal chest CT. Radiology. 2020; 295: E3-E.
  31. Wu J, Wu X, Zeng W, Guo D, Fang Z, Chen L, et al. Chest CT findings in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 and its relationship with clinical features. Investigative radiology. 2020; 55: 257.
  32. Besharat S, Malekpour Alamdari N, Dadashzadeh N, Talaie R, Mousavi SS, Barzegar A, et al. Clinical and demographic characteristics of patients with COVID-19 who died in Modarres hospital. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2020; 144: 144-149.
  33. Armstrong R, Kane A, Cook T. Outcomes from intensive care in patients with COVID‐19: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of observational studies. Anaesthesia. 2020; 75: 1340-1349.